1PO1-70 Cuprates Versus Fullerines High-T_c Superconductor Noise Power-Spectrum Dichotomy Diagnostics Implications for Superconductivity Generic "Mechanisms" Dichotomy: Original Multi-Band Spin-Orbital Degeneracy Hubbard-Model for Cuprates

Edward Siegel, S.P.D. "FUZZYICS", San Diego, CA 92109, USA, and I.C.T.P., Trieste, Italy.

Presenting Author: E. Siegel

"Noise" power-spectrum Dichotomy for cuprates' of Testa, Patton et. al. [1] versus alkali-metal fullerines ("buckyballs") of Pohang [2] leads to simple interpretation in terms of Siegel [3] S.P.D.:"FUZZYICS", which with Siegel [4] quantum-statistics Dichotomy explanation, leads to Siegel's [5] puzzling conclusions: cuprate r-space pairing non-Bose-Einstein condensation versus fullerine k-space pairing Bose-Einstein condensation, about just what superconductivity really is (?), most especially in light of the Wohleben [6]-effect of Meissner-effect violations!

Original Siegel [7] cuprates' high-T_c spin-orbital degeneracy Hubbard-model (SODHM) ("p-wave" versus "d-wave" ... versus "any/all 1>0-wave") based upon Moriya [8]-Siegel[9]-Seigel & Kemeny [10] SODHM of magnetic: ferromagnetic(F)-Overhauser spiral spin-density waves (SSDW)-(any types of) antiferroagnetic(AFM)-superconducting (SC)-paramagnetic phase-transitions' phase-diagrams (and congruent inverse electronic metal-semietal-semiconductor-insulator phase-transitions' phase-diagrams) with Siegel [7] applications only to cuprates' high-T_c superconductivity very-early calculation of T_c are reviewed. The amazingly still-ongoing [11] fallacy of r-space chemistry-like models/theories/... versus correct condensed-matter/solid-state k-space theories/models the former a la classic seminal Brillouin [12] violating the very original seminal propetic Brillouin foundations of condensed-matter/solid-state physics(!), is highlighted and taken to task very strongly: "BANDS, NOT Bonds!", hence "not 'p-wave' versus 'd-wave'", but three/six-bands versus five/ten-bands, SODHM!

[1] J. Testa, C. Patton et. al.: High-T_c Symp., MRS Fall Mtg., Boston (1987).

[2] C. Li et. al., (Pohang Univ., Korea), High-T_c Update (10/1/1990), Phys. Rev. Lett. (1992).

[3] E. Siegel, Symp. on Fractals..., MRS Fall Mtg., Boston (1989)-5-papers!; Symp. on Scaling..., ibid. (1990); Symp. on Transport in Geometrical-Confinement/Contraints, ibid. (1990).

[4] E. Siegel: Schrodinger Centenary Symp., Imperial College, London (1987); Symp. on Fdns. of Physics: The Copenhagen Interpretation Fifty Years After the Como Lecture, Joensuu, Finland (1987); Bull A.P.S. March Mtgs.: Anaheim (1990); Indianapolis (1992).

[5] E. Siegel, World Cong. on Superconductivity, Munich (1992).

[6] D. Wohleben, Phys. Rev. Lett. (192); Z. Physik (1992).

[7] E. Siegel: World Cong. on Superconductivity, Munich (1992); Bull A.P.S. March Mtgs: Anaheim (1990); Indianapolis (1992); Highly-Correlated Electron-Systems Conf., Santa Fe (1990); Intl. Conf. on High-T_c, Stanford (1998?).

[8] T. Moriya, in Transition-Metal Magnetism, Academic (1967.)

[9] E. Siegel, Doctoral Dissertation, M.S.U. (1970); Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 55,817; J. Mag. Mag. Mtls. (1976-1980)-many-papers!; Mag. Lett. (1980)-2-papers!

[10] E. Siegel & G. Kemeny, Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 50, 593 (1972).

[11] S.P.I.E. Mtg., San Diego (1998).

[12] L. Brillouin, Wave-Propagation in Periodic-Structures, Dover (1921)!

[13] A.W. Overhauser: Phys. Rev. 35,1,411 (1987); Intl. J. Mod. Phys. 1,2,&4, 927 (1987).

[14] T_c greater than or equal to 77 F: High-T_c Update, 11, 1 (1/1/1997); Applied Superconductivity Conf. (1996); S. Contreras, R. Lucas, J-P Bastide, P. Claudy, M. Escorne, A. Pecheron-Guegan, and A. Mauger, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, t. 324, Serie II b, 641 (1997).

[15] E. Siegel, Symp. on Fractals..., MRS Fall Mtg., Boston (1989)-5-papers!; Symp. on Scaling..., ibid. (1990); Symp. on Transport in Geometrically-Confined/Constrained Systems, ibid. (1990), Aristotle Birthday Symp. on Mechanics and Physics, Thessoloniki (1990).

[16] E. Siegel: Schrodinger Centenary Symp., Imperial College, London (1987); Symp. on Fdns. of Mod. Phys.; The Copenhagen Interpretation Fifty Years After the Como Lecture, Joensuu, Finland (1987); Bull A.P.S. March Mtgs: Anahei (1990); Indianapolis (1992).